Natty Narwhal Ubuntu 11.04 has been very controversial. Ubuntu leads the pack in consumer-based Linux distributions, so when Ubuntu left a more classic Gnome desktop to embrace their Unity desktop interface that was previously used only on their netbook edition--it was bound to cause controversy.
My first impression of Natty on my desktop was that I liked it. I liked the way it looked, and having a bit of experience with "Docky" a Gnome desktop application that looks and works much like Unity, I warmed up to it. But the problem begins with looking for software that you don't use every day. It can take several clicks into the sub menus to find what you are looking for, and the Unity toolbar can become obnoxious when you are constantly closing and expanding or reducing windows because Ubuntu has by default all the windows opening and closing on the upper left corner instead of the traditional right hand side like on MS Windows.
I think Linux Mint 11 has spoiled me a bit. Based very much on Ubuntu, Mint 11 has all the packages and many features of Ubuntu but with a more classic computer interface. I would definitely recommend Mint 11 to new computer users, but I would be a bit more hesitant to recommend Ubuntu 11.04 with its unity desktop to new Linux users.
I like Ubuntu, and even the strange Unity interface. But it does cause a bit of irritation when the Unity toolbar pops out unexpectantly from getting the mouse a bit close to the left side of the desktop, or contrariwise it becomes irritating when the toolbar doesn't come out on cue. And the workspace switcher in Unity is practically unusable because it has to be launched from the hide-and-seek toolbar instead of from the desktop itself like in Mint.
Ubuntu and just about any Linux operating system is better than MS Windows in my view. More secure, faster, easy to use, and free. Ubuntu is nice if you want something much different from the XP or Win7 desktop environments. It can be a little buggy on occasion, and even a bit frustrating to locate programs and launch software, but it is worth giving it a shot.
Pros: Sleek interface, nice eye-candy, reasonably easy to operate, supported as the most popular user Linux distribution. Comes as live CD to test drive. Ubuntu One free 5 gig. storage is great. Easy to install.
Cons: Doesn't work well if at all from live USB. Interface has a definite learning curve and hard to find software if it isn't on the toolbar/launcher. 11.04 is a bit buggy.
Conclusion: If you want to know anything about Linux I think you have to at least try Ubuntu from a live CD. I have it included as one of the triple-boot operating systems on my netbook. Ubuntu is fun to play with. It can be a bit irritating when you want the operating system out of the way and just need to get things done. Despite its irritations, Ubuntu and its Unity desktop has grown on me. I'm looking forward to the Long Term Support (LTS) version which will be released next spring. It will be built upon the less buggy Debian Testing instead of Debian Unstable version of Linux, and hopefully by then then Unity desktop will be a bit more usable. It is worth taking Ubuntu, the most popular Linux distribution, for a test drive.
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Christians Need Not Fear Science
My response to a question on a forum that asked: Why should anyone take Christians seriously regarding science when most Christians no nothing about science yet make unproven claims based solely upon a Fundamentalist approach to the Bible. My response follows.
I think the question is a fair one for Christians. We are not usually experts at geology or other areas of science. It boils down to a single problem--if a Christian insists on their version of an absolute literal approach to the Bible then they feel must defend it literally, even when it doesn't measure up to the fossil record, scientific facts, etc.
I personally think this is a wrong approach. If the sun and moon were not even created until the 4th day--according to Genesis--why must we insist on literal 24 hour days of creation? What if God merely revealed His creation plan to Moses over a period of 7 days? I think the absolute literalist approach to the Bible is wrong, because it misses the bigger picture.
The Bible is a book of theology and teaching first and foremost, and not a science text book. One can believe the stories of the Bible and grasp the teaching without demanding everything be taken absolutely literally. The point it makes is that God is Creator, humankind fallen beings prone to sin, and that God is involved with His creation and humanity. But to use the Bible as an excuse for ignoring facts and denying truth is a big mistake that hurts our credibility with the non-Christian world.
This does not mean we should set aside our skepticism of science or our right to question the facts presented, but faith in God does not demand denial of scientific truth.
Science can neither prove nor disprove the reality of God. We need not fear science. A willingness to consider that Jesus used parables and stories to teach greater truths in the New Testament can be used as a pattern looking backward towards Geneses. Don't fear science, don't fear truth, Jesus is the friend of truth, and we should be as well.
I think the question is a fair one for Christians. We are not usually experts at geology or other areas of science. It boils down to a single problem--if a Christian insists on their version of an absolute literal approach to the Bible then they feel must defend it literally, even when it doesn't measure up to the fossil record, scientific facts, etc.
I personally think this is a wrong approach. If the sun and moon were not even created until the 4th day--according to Genesis--why must we insist on literal 24 hour days of creation? What if God merely revealed His creation plan to Moses over a period of 7 days? I think the absolute literalist approach to the Bible is wrong, because it misses the bigger picture.
The Bible is a book of theology and teaching first and foremost, and not a science text book. One can believe the stories of the Bible and grasp the teaching without demanding everything be taken absolutely literally. The point it makes is that God is Creator, humankind fallen beings prone to sin, and that God is involved with His creation and humanity. But to use the Bible as an excuse for ignoring facts and denying truth is a big mistake that hurts our credibility with the non-Christian world.
This does not mean we should set aside our skepticism of science or our right to question the facts presented, but faith in God does not demand denial of scientific truth.
Science can neither prove nor disprove the reality of God. We need not fear science. A willingness to consider that Jesus used parables and stories to teach greater truths in the New Testament can be used as a pattern looking backward towards Geneses. Don't fear science, don't fear truth, Jesus is the friend of truth, and we should be as well.
Monday, August 15, 2011
Gotta Love The Penguin
I recently commented that I should call my blog: God and Linux. That seems to be the two subjects mostly floating through my brain recently. In this blog post I want to cover some of the things involved in keeping Linux working and making Linux workable from my recent experiences.
Keep in mind that Windows is not a maintenance free operating system, not with constant updates, searching the net for needed programs and drivers, and the constant threat of viruses and spyware. Having said that, depending upon what your needs may be, you're going to do some Googling to find programs and fixes for programs to run on Linux.
Examples, I like downloading digital music from Amazon. But Amazon's MP3 Downloader--necessary for downloading complete albums--is only set up for older Linux versions. On my netbook running Linux Mint I had to search the net for an Ubuntu fix--Mint is closely based on Ubuntu--and after putting in several command lines of code I finally got it installed. On my Desktop Computer running Mepis--based on Debian Stable--it was a bigger job getting the Downloader installed. What saved me was the Mepis message forum where kind souls are willing to help Linux newbies like me. After following their instructions I soon had Amazon's Downloader working on my Desktop.
There will be some failures. A program called Wine is supposed to run Windows programs on Linux. Now it is hit or miss as to whether it actually works, supposedly AutoRealm, a map-making program, would run under Wine. But after much frustration and finally getting AutoRealm to launch, when I tried to open files I'd previously made using AutoRealm on Windows, the maps were garbled and useless. So there are certainly hiccups with Linux.
Yet despite the few disappointments, I still love the Penguin. I was thrilled to find a program for Pandora called Pithos. This great little music box streams Pandora music flawlessly and I have it on all three of our computers running Linux. Gwenview is another Linux worth mentioning. It does a great job managing photos. Banshee is another Linux winner. It manages my music library excellently. I use it on all three of our computers.
There is a Linux program called Gramps that manages genealogy wonderfully. Then there is Stellarium which shows the night sky, star charts, and provides information about many stars. And if you like ebooks, there is a program called Calibre which can manage those for you. Indeed, there is not much that I can do in Windows that can't be done in Linux. The software repository in Linux Mint has over 30,000 packages in it. And there are some Windows programs that can be ran on Linux using Wine.
There is a learning curve with Linux. But so was there with Windows. It seemed there was always more to learn with Windows just to keep the thing working. And with new versions of Windows you have to begin again. I've found that with Linux, despite many different versions, there are strong similarities across the spectrum of distros. And a Linux update to a newer version usually means an easier operating system, not a more complex, more bloated operating system.
One can find reasons to dislike the Penguin if they try, but there is much to love and enjoy with Linux. I'm still learning, but I find that everything I learn builds up a base of knowledge that makes things easier and easier regarding Linux. As the title says: Gotta Love The Penguin.
Keep in mind that Windows is not a maintenance free operating system, not with constant updates, searching the net for needed programs and drivers, and the constant threat of viruses and spyware. Having said that, depending upon what your needs may be, you're going to do some Googling to find programs and fixes for programs to run on Linux.
Examples, I like downloading digital music from Amazon. But Amazon's MP3 Downloader--necessary for downloading complete albums--is only set up for older Linux versions. On my netbook running Linux Mint I had to search the net for an Ubuntu fix--Mint is closely based on Ubuntu--and after putting in several command lines of code I finally got it installed. On my Desktop Computer running Mepis--based on Debian Stable--it was a bigger job getting the Downloader installed. What saved me was the Mepis message forum where kind souls are willing to help Linux newbies like me. After following their instructions I soon had Amazon's Downloader working on my Desktop.
There will be some failures. A program called Wine is supposed to run Windows programs on Linux. Now it is hit or miss as to whether it actually works, supposedly AutoRealm, a map-making program, would run under Wine. But after much frustration and finally getting AutoRealm to launch, when I tried to open files I'd previously made using AutoRealm on Windows, the maps were garbled and useless. So there are certainly hiccups with Linux.
Yet despite the few disappointments, I still love the Penguin. I was thrilled to find a program for Pandora called Pithos. This great little music box streams Pandora music flawlessly and I have it on all three of our computers running Linux. Gwenview is another Linux worth mentioning. It does a great job managing photos. Banshee is another Linux winner. It manages my music library excellently. I use it on all three of our computers.
There is a Linux program called Gramps that manages genealogy wonderfully. Then there is Stellarium which shows the night sky, star charts, and provides information about many stars. And if you like ebooks, there is a program called Calibre which can manage those for you. Indeed, there is not much that I can do in Windows that can't be done in Linux. The software repository in Linux Mint has over 30,000 packages in it. And there are some Windows programs that can be ran on Linux using Wine.
There is a learning curve with Linux. But so was there with Windows. It seemed there was always more to learn with Windows just to keep the thing working. And with new versions of Windows you have to begin again. I've found that with Linux, despite many different versions, there are strong similarities across the spectrum of distros. And a Linux update to a newer version usually means an easier operating system, not a more complex, more bloated operating system.
One can find reasons to dislike the Penguin if they try, but there is much to love and enjoy with Linux. I'm still learning, but I find that everything I learn builds up a base of knowledge that makes things easier and easier regarding Linux. As the title says: Gotta Love The Penguin.
Sunday, August 14, 2011
Concern For The Kids
OK, this will be something of a rant, but I think it is time for one. I'm getting tired of watching politicians piss away the future of the younger generation. It was bad enough when I was growing up, yet even though I didn't feel the politicians were all that great, they at least did not seem completely hopeless and helpless. Where have our leaders gone?
I have lived the biggest part of my life, and though I would really like to see my country do well for my own benefit, my greater concern is that it do well for my child's benefit. I recently read an article that shows the pessimism of young people today regarding the economy. And I recently had a discussion with my daughter that drove home the truth of just how bad things are today when I told her my advice was not to even consider buying a home in today's market. It took me back to about 25 years ago when I had just been married a short while, and would soon be working in a factory making about $9 an hour which was pretty good pay back then. Indeed, a kid today is lucky to make even $12 an hour, and considering inflation that would probably be about 6-7 dollars an hour compared to what I made back then.
The crux of my advice was that I could afford a home priced in the 35-40,000 dollar range 25 years ago, and the value of that home today would be over 100,000 dollars. But today houses are over-valued in price. A decent house will cost over 100,000 dollars in most markets, and likely will not be worth what it costs, even 4-5 years down the road. In other words, you can't count on your home as an investment anymore. You are better off renting. And that is what I told my child, and I felt a sense of sickness and unease in the pit of my stomach as I said the words, for even though true, it shows just how far we are falling and failing as a culture that kids today cannot even look forward to owning a home, not unless they want to make a bad investment that eats up most of their income.
Who is to blame for this situation? How did our economy get in this mess? There is plenty of blame to go around. First we can truly blame our politicians. Though President Clinton reigned over one of the best economies we ever saw, he also pushed our manufacturing jobs overseas, and so has every President since. This is no small thing because any kid getting out of High School could get a decent job and raise a family just a few decades ago. Our foolish politicians helped change all that.
Democrats have shown themselves unwilling to stand up for the poor and middle class, mostly preferring a "holding action" to merely retain what power they can while keeping the money-men happy. Republicans are as bad or worse, taking every opportunity to sell out the poor and middle class for they wealthiest Americans. It seems no one in politics realizes that when the poor and middle class--most Americans--have no money, the economy is going to suck air.
One thing Clinton did do right, and I credit it with helping the economy, is to create the earned income tax credit. This put money into the hands of poor Americans and what happens when poor Americans get needed money? They spend it on things they need like refrigerators, air-conditioners, home repairs, and everything you can think of, which creates a need for more products, which creates more jobs. But today the manufacturing jobs are gone to Mexico, and overseas. So buying more products does not immediately affect the economy as it did even a few decade ago. Ours has become a service economy, and it will be for the foreseeable future, which means it will be harder to boost the economy.
In some respects we are all to blame. We elected people who did a terrible job, then we get terrible results and wonder why. The two party system is broken. It is often being led by extremists on both sides, and the moderate voices in each party are silenced and shut out, even while the country itself is mostly made up of centrists and Independents who simply want government to work and then stay out of their lives.
Is there a fix? I honestly hope so. We are too often given choices for candidates that are below par from the two major political parties. God knows we want good people, but only those with the loudest voices seem to get a place at the table, the wiser, calmer heads seem never to prevail. So we can certainly blame the political parties. Yet all the blame gets us nowhere, and makes us feel even more powerless.
This will sound like the same old tired song you would expect from a Christian in this country, but let me preface it by saying what we are seeing from the Christian Right has nothing to do with what I'm about to say. Indeed, I do not believe the Christian Right has helped in the political arena.
I believe we need humility and prayer and a focus on Christian ethics. Christian ethics does not allow for the enrichment of the most wealthy at the cost of the poor and middle class. Christian ethics does not encourage the disenfranchisement of the majority of Americans for the benefit of the few. Humility before God admits that we do not have all the answers, nor do we even ask the right questions, we need help from above for our many problems.
Saying "I will pray for you" sounds trite. But in fact, a humble prayer asking for God's intervention is a powerful thing that can change circumstances, even entire countries, and yes, even economies. I think if we are asking not to become wealthy ourselves, but asking that those who are suffering financially would be helped--that is a good prayer. To ask God to give us wisdom in choosing, and in having good candidates to choose from--that is a good prayer. To ask God to help Joe-schmuck who we want to get elected because he sounds religious--that is the wrong prayer.
It will take more than prayer, though that is a good place to start. We must quit allowing politicians to play upon our feelings, inciting our anger and fears. We must choose candidates with wisdom, and especially based upon their experience and accomplishments. Too often it is charisma or their ability to incite anger that gets politicians elected without considering their past actions. Let their deeds speak louder than their words!
I fear at the root of our financial difficulties lies an ingrained selfishness. If everyone would give a little, especially those who can afford it the most, and if corporations would consider their responsibility to their nation and fellow Americans above their desire for more profits, we would all be better off.
America is a great country and Americans are a very generous people. We need politicians who will remind us of that. And we need ethical politicians. I know, those words don't fit together very well, but I am optimist enough to believe that principled people still exist, and those people can, and should run for office.
We are Americans. We can accomplish anything we put our minds to. But something has to change in the way we treat each other in the political realm. And something must change in the way we look at our country--we must begin to take a long view, one that enables us to see what kind of future we want for our children and their children. Yes, my fellow Christians, we need God in this nation, but we don't need religious hate wrapped up in politics. How easily we forget that they will know us by our love.
I don't see things improving in the immediate future, but I do believe things can improve. We must insist that things improve, for despite the screwball politicians, they still need us to get elected, and this political mess is still empowered by the people, and we can insist that whoever we choose follows what we the people want, or they are out on their heads. We need to clean house, we need to elect a new set of politicians who truly represent us. But we must be smarter, more considerate, more thoughtful in who We Choose! Let's find the candidates who will put our, and the country's best interest first above their own, and as citizens let's do our part to hold them accountable. But above all things, let's be wise as serpents and stop being dumb sheep following loud mouth shepherds about.
Our children and their future need our help and God's help. We have drifted off course, allowing politicians to divide us foolishly, and allowing ourselves to be led in the wrong direction. We have let religious leaders manipulate us to the point the Religious Right is considered representative of both Christianity and conservative politics. I don't believe the Religious Right is representative of the majority of Christ Followers of this country, nor do I think thoughtful conservatives buy into their thinking. For certain they do not represent me as an Evangelical Christian or as someone with conservative politics.
Sincere prayer, humility before God and others, true Christian ethics back into the public arena, and love rather than hate as our motivator, perhaps then we can see a more just political and economic system and prosperity for all. It is past time for true Christians to put aside hate and selfishness and instead put on the mantle of smart compassion that is led by love and good will toward our fellow Americans. What we say is not as important as what we do. Let's make the right choices and then do the right things so that our children will not only have the advantages we have, but an even brighter future.
I have lived the biggest part of my life, and though I would really like to see my country do well for my own benefit, my greater concern is that it do well for my child's benefit. I recently read an article that shows the pessimism of young people today regarding the economy. And I recently had a discussion with my daughter that drove home the truth of just how bad things are today when I told her my advice was not to even consider buying a home in today's market. It took me back to about 25 years ago when I had just been married a short while, and would soon be working in a factory making about $9 an hour which was pretty good pay back then. Indeed, a kid today is lucky to make even $12 an hour, and considering inflation that would probably be about 6-7 dollars an hour compared to what I made back then.
The crux of my advice was that I could afford a home priced in the 35-40,000 dollar range 25 years ago, and the value of that home today would be over 100,000 dollars. But today houses are over-valued in price. A decent house will cost over 100,000 dollars in most markets, and likely will not be worth what it costs, even 4-5 years down the road. In other words, you can't count on your home as an investment anymore. You are better off renting. And that is what I told my child, and I felt a sense of sickness and unease in the pit of my stomach as I said the words, for even though true, it shows just how far we are falling and failing as a culture that kids today cannot even look forward to owning a home, not unless they want to make a bad investment that eats up most of their income.
Who is to blame for this situation? How did our economy get in this mess? There is plenty of blame to go around. First we can truly blame our politicians. Though President Clinton reigned over one of the best economies we ever saw, he also pushed our manufacturing jobs overseas, and so has every President since. This is no small thing because any kid getting out of High School could get a decent job and raise a family just a few decades ago. Our foolish politicians helped change all that.
Democrats have shown themselves unwilling to stand up for the poor and middle class, mostly preferring a "holding action" to merely retain what power they can while keeping the money-men happy. Republicans are as bad or worse, taking every opportunity to sell out the poor and middle class for they wealthiest Americans. It seems no one in politics realizes that when the poor and middle class--most Americans--have no money, the economy is going to suck air.
One thing Clinton did do right, and I credit it with helping the economy, is to create the earned income tax credit. This put money into the hands of poor Americans and what happens when poor Americans get needed money? They spend it on things they need like refrigerators, air-conditioners, home repairs, and everything you can think of, which creates a need for more products, which creates more jobs. But today the manufacturing jobs are gone to Mexico, and overseas. So buying more products does not immediately affect the economy as it did even a few decade ago. Ours has become a service economy, and it will be for the foreseeable future, which means it will be harder to boost the economy.
In some respects we are all to blame. We elected people who did a terrible job, then we get terrible results and wonder why. The two party system is broken. It is often being led by extremists on both sides, and the moderate voices in each party are silenced and shut out, even while the country itself is mostly made up of centrists and Independents who simply want government to work and then stay out of their lives.
Is there a fix? I honestly hope so. We are too often given choices for candidates that are below par from the two major political parties. God knows we want good people, but only those with the loudest voices seem to get a place at the table, the wiser, calmer heads seem never to prevail. So we can certainly blame the political parties. Yet all the blame gets us nowhere, and makes us feel even more powerless.
This will sound like the same old tired song you would expect from a Christian in this country, but let me preface it by saying what we are seeing from the Christian Right has nothing to do with what I'm about to say. Indeed, I do not believe the Christian Right has helped in the political arena.
I believe we need humility and prayer and a focus on Christian ethics. Christian ethics does not allow for the enrichment of the most wealthy at the cost of the poor and middle class. Christian ethics does not encourage the disenfranchisement of the majority of Americans for the benefit of the few. Humility before God admits that we do not have all the answers, nor do we even ask the right questions, we need help from above for our many problems.
Saying "I will pray for you" sounds trite. But in fact, a humble prayer asking for God's intervention is a powerful thing that can change circumstances, even entire countries, and yes, even economies. I think if we are asking not to become wealthy ourselves, but asking that those who are suffering financially would be helped--that is a good prayer. To ask God to give us wisdom in choosing, and in having good candidates to choose from--that is a good prayer. To ask God to help Joe-schmuck who we want to get elected because he sounds religious--that is the wrong prayer.
It will take more than prayer, though that is a good place to start. We must quit allowing politicians to play upon our feelings, inciting our anger and fears. We must choose candidates with wisdom, and especially based upon their experience and accomplishments. Too often it is charisma or their ability to incite anger that gets politicians elected without considering their past actions. Let their deeds speak louder than their words!
I fear at the root of our financial difficulties lies an ingrained selfishness. If everyone would give a little, especially those who can afford it the most, and if corporations would consider their responsibility to their nation and fellow Americans above their desire for more profits, we would all be better off.
America is a great country and Americans are a very generous people. We need politicians who will remind us of that. And we need ethical politicians. I know, those words don't fit together very well, but I am optimist enough to believe that principled people still exist, and those people can, and should run for office.
We are Americans. We can accomplish anything we put our minds to. But something has to change in the way we treat each other in the political realm. And something must change in the way we look at our country--we must begin to take a long view, one that enables us to see what kind of future we want for our children and their children. Yes, my fellow Christians, we need God in this nation, but we don't need religious hate wrapped up in politics. How easily we forget that they will know us by our love.
I don't see things improving in the immediate future, but I do believe things can improve. We must insist that things improve, for despite the screwball politicians, they still need us to get elected, and this political mess is still empowered by the people, and we can insist that whoever we choose follows what we the people want, or they are out on their heads. We need to clean house, we need to elect a new set of politicians who truly represent us. But we must be smarter, more considerate, more thoughtful in who We Choose! Let's find the candidates who will put our, and the country's best interest first above their own, and as citizens let's do our part to hold them accountable. But above all things, let's be wise as serpents and stop being dumb sheep following loud mouth shepherds about.
Our children and their future need our help and God's help. We have drifted off course, allowing politicians to divide us foolishly, and allowing ourselves to be led in the wrong direction. We have let religious leaders manipulate us to the point the Religious Right is considered representative of both Christianity and conservative politics. I don't believe the Religious Right is representative of the majority of Christ Followers of this country, nor do I think thoughtful conservatives buy into their thinking. For certain they do not represent me as an Evangelical Christian or as someone with conservative politics.
Sincere prayer, humility before God and others, true Christian ethics back into the public arena, and love rather than hate as our motivator, perhaps then we can see a more just political and economic system and prosperity for all. It is past time for true Christians to put aside hate and selfishness and instead put on the mantle of smart compassion that is led by love and good will toward our fellow Americans. What we say is not as important as what we do. Let's make the right choices and then do the right things so that our children will not only have the advantages we have, but an even brighter future.
Thursday, August 4, 2011
Linux For Everyone
I like a recent article I came across that points out there is a Linux version for everyone. I believe that is true. But I also think with so many flavors of Linux available it is very hard to chose the right one. People who are new to Linux with very limited technical abilities are going to need a simple, user friendly version that will need no tweaking--or very little.
The screenshot above is of Joli OS, one of the most user friendly Linux distributions. Most of the programs and web pages are launched from apps on the desktop. I've not once used a command line on that version, and I honestly am not sure where to find it in Joli OS. Many Windows users fear the command line and want things very simple and easy to use--Joli OS may be for them.
I have tried out some other user friendly Linux distributions recently. Linux Mint 9 is the Long Term Support (LTS) version of Mint, and I have found it to be very easy for a new Linux user. I also like the idea of LTS releases as they appear to be more stable and bug free than newer releases. Another LTS Linux version that I have recently tried is Ubuntu 10.04 which was also user friendly. Ubuntu is the most popular version of Linux, and many distributions are based on it, including Joli OS and Linux Mint.
Yet another Ubuntu based distribution that I have recently used is Kubuntu 10.04 This version is basically Ubuntu but with a KDE desktop environment which might prove familiar with Widows users. I know that I warmed up to the KDE desktop on SimplyMepis very quickly.
From my limited experience of using Linux the past few months, trying out: Fedora 15 (hated it), Debian (didn't care for it), Pinguy OS & Pinguy Mini (nice), OpenSuse (didn't work on either of my computers), Joli OS (very nice), SimplyMepis (excellent), Ubuntu (nice), Kubuntu (very nice), Mint (excellent), AntiX (didn't care for it), PCLinuxOS (was OK), Puppy Linux (very nice), Zorin (nice), and Fuduntu (very nice), I've found the Ubuntu based distros generally worked best for me.
Again, I'm a Linux newbie myself, but my best advice to other newbies is to try out any Linux distro first using Live CD/DVD to make sure it works with your computer hardware and drivers. Next make sure that you can do basic things like print documents, write documents, connect to the net, surf the web without any hiccups, and that you like the interface, the desktop. That you can find things easily, and that everything just "works".
In just this short time I pretty much hate using Windows for anything after using Linux. Mainly because Windows runs so slow on my computers after running Linux. Yet having a dual-boot computer that still has Windows on it can be important for transitioning to Linux. While Linux has alternate programs for most Windows applications, it might take awhile to find them and to get used to them.
Perhaps the biggest hurdle for me in the beginning was simply figuring out how to download and burn the iso image of Linux software. I found a Windows program called Imageburn that worked well for doing this in Windows. Once I had Linux on my desktop I used the program called Brasero to burn downloaded Linux iso images for use.
I know there are some people who will never let go of Windows, yet others, like myself, may find that the software bloat and slowness, the constant threat of viruses and spyware, the continual maintenance of Windows with ever-present updates, running anti-virus scans, and the built-in bugginess of Windows far outweighs the small learning curve of Linux. I can't see myself ever going back to Windows after using Linux. SimplyMepis on my desktop has been so rock solid that even with my Linux ignorance I haven't been able to mess it up. And the biggest problem with Linux on my netbook has been deciding which Linux distro I like best for it.
The saying "if something works don't fix it" is a favorite of mine. My conclusion was that Windows is broke. It became all to obvious to me on my desktop when a Windows virus killed the machine, and on my netbook as it moved through Windows programs at a snail's pace. If you find Windows is making your life more irritating than easy, you should consider giving Linux a try.
The screenshot above is of Joli OS, one of the most user friendly Linux distributions. Most of the programs and web pages are launched from apps on the desktop. I've not once used a command line on that version, and I honestly am not sure where to find it in Joli OS. Many Windows users fear the command line and want things very simple and easy to use--Joli OS may be for them.
I have tried out some other user friendly Linux distributions recently. Linux Mint 9 is the Long Term Support (LTS) version of Mint, and I have found it to be very easy for a new Linux user. I also like the idea of LTS releases as they appear to be more stable and bug free than newer releases. Another LTS Linux version that I have recently tried is Ubuntu 10.04 which was also user friendly. Ubuntu is the most popular version of Linux, and many distributions are based on it, including Joli OS and Linux Mint.
Yet another Ubuntu based distribution that I have recently used is Kubuntu 10.04 This version is basically Ubuntu but with a KDE desktop environment which might prove familiar with Widows users. I know that I warmed up to the KDE desktop on SimplyMepis very quickly.
From my limited experience of using Linux the past few months, trying out: Fedora 15 (hated it), Debian (didn't care for it), Pinguy OS & Pinguy Mini (nice), OpenSuse (didn't work on either of my computers), Joli OS (very nice), SimplyMepis (excellent), Ubuntu (nice), Kubuntu (very nice), Mint (excellent), AntiX (didn't care for it), PCLinuxOS (was OK), Puppy Linux (very nice), Zorin (nice), and Fuduntu (very nice), I've found the Ubuntu based distros generally worked best for me.
Again, I'm a Linux newbie myself, but my best advice to other newbies is to try out any Linux distro first using Live CD/DVD to make sure it works with your computer hardware and drivers. Next make sure that you can do basic things like print documents, write documents, connect to the net, surf the web without any hiccups, and that you like the interface, the desktop. That you can find things easily, and that everything just "works".
In just this short time I pretty much hate using Windows for anything after using Linux. Mainly because Windows runs so slow on my computers after running Linux. Yet having a dual-boot computer that still has Windows on it can be important for transitioning to Linux. While Linux has alternate programs for most Windows applications, it might take awhile to find them and to get used to them.
Perhaps the biggest hurdle for me in the beginning was simply figuring out how to download and burn the iso image of Linux software. I found a Windows program called Imageburn that worked well for doing this in Windows. Once I had Linux on my desktop I used the program called Brasero to burn downloaded Linux iso images for use.
I know there are some people who will never let go of Windows, yet others, like myself, may find that the software bloat and slowness, the constant threat of viruses and spyware, the continual maintenance of Windows with ever-present updates, running anti-virus scans, and the built-in bugginess of Windows far outweighs the small learning curve of Linux. I can't see myself ever going back to Windows after using Linux. SimplyMepis on my desktop has been so rock solid that even with my Linux ignorance I haven't been able to mess it up. And the biggest problem with Linux on my netbook has been deciding which Linux distro I like best for it.
The saying "if something works don't fix it" is a favorite of mine. My conclusion was that Windows is broke. It became all to obvious to me on my desktop when a Windows virus killed the machine, and on my netbook as it moved through Windows programs at a snail's pace. If you find Windows is making your life more irritating than easy, you should consider giving Linux a try.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




